Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Islamic Religious Education Learning in Vocational Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69552/mumtaz.v6i1.3753Keywords:
Academic Integrity, Artificial Intelligence, Digital PedagogyAbstract
The development of Artificial Intelligence has brought changes to student learning practices, including in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) in Vocational High Schools. This AI integration not only expands access to religious knowledge but also raises challenges related to academic integrity. This study aims to describe students’ use of AI in Islamic Education (PAI) classes, analyze students’ perceptions of technology use within the framework of academic integrity, and identify teachers’ pedagogical strategies for mediating AI use so that it remains consistent with the values internalized in the learning process. This study uses a qualitative case study design. Data was collected through in-depth interviews, learning observations, and assignment documentation, and was analyzed thematically. The results show that AI is integrated into learning practices as a tool for understanding the material and composing responses. Students show an ambivalent ethical dynamic between technological efficiency and academic honesty norms. Teachers' pedagogical practices function as a mediation through authentic assessments, reflective dialogues, and the affirmation of the value of honesty, integrated into the learning process. Students also negotiate the use of AI by modifying the results and combining them with other sources. These findings suggest that AI integration does not directly erode academic integrity but shifts its practice toward a more contextual and situational approach, depending on pedagogical design and the intensity of teacher mediation. The study also shows that religious values serve as a normative framework that shapes how learners interpret and use AI in the context of academic honesty.
References
Bearman, M., Nieminen, J. H., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Designing assessment in a digital world: an organising framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2069674
Berkowitz, M. (2021). PRIMED for Character Education: Six Design Principles for School Improvement. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351030267
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological., 2, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Bretag, T., Harper, R., Rundle, K., Newton, P. M., Ellis, C., Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2020). Contract cheating in Australian higher education: a comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1614146
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A classification tool to foster self-regulated learning with generative artificial intelligence by applying self-determination theory: a case of ChatGPT. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(4), 2401–2416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10366-w
Chiu, T. K. F., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2024). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(7), 3240–3256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044
Creswell, John W. Cheryl N, P. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design. SAGE Publications.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Eaton, S. E. (2023). Postplagiarism: transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00144-1
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings. In Education Sciences (Vol. 13, Issue 7, p. 692). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
Hidayati, D., Rifa’i, A. A., & Rochmah, S. N. W. (2023). Learning Management System in Madrasah: A Study of Teacher Readiness and Acceptance of Technology. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(3), 719–735. https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v7i3.4322
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education. Promise and Implications for Teaching and Learning.
Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824–2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861
Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis : a methods sourcebook (Fourth edition, International student edition.). SAGE.
Mueller, M. L. (2025). It’s just distributed computing: Rethinking AI governance. Telecommunications Policy, 49(3), 102917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.102917
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Panadero, E. (2017). A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology, Volume 8-. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2024). Generative AI and Agency in Education: A Critical Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.00631
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should Robots Replace Teachers?: AI and the Future of Education. Polity Press.
Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity? ArXiv, abs/2212.0. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:254853785
Suyadi, S., Susilowati, S., & Supriyatno, T. (2021). Islamic Character Education for Student of Public Higher Education in Indonesia BT - Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Social Science (ICONETOS 2020). 591–598. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210421.086
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wiwin Fachrudin Yusuf, Nike Febrian Imelda, Abdul Kholiq

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


