The Effect of Hybrid Learning Method on the Effectiveness of Islamic Religious Education Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69552/mumtaz.v6i1.3544Keywords:
Blended learning, Hybrid Learning, Learning EffectivenessAbstract
Hybrid learning is a learning method that combines online and conventional learning. The initial definition of this theory was put forward by Graham, namely the combination of face-to-face learning with computer-based (online) learning. The COVID-19 pandemic that hit the world several years ago has had a significant impact on people's lifestyles, one of which is in the field of education. With the social distancing restrictions implemented by the government, distance learning (online classes) has been echoed, causing culture shock in society. Concerns about the effectiveness of home learning have also been questioned, will it provide a positive contribution to students or will it actually make learning passive and ineffective. This study aims to determine whether there is an effect of hybrid learning on learning effectiveness and how significant that influence is. Therefore, this study uses quantitative methods to obtain precise and accurate results on the relationship between hybrid learning and learning effectiveness. The benefits of this study are to add references on hybrid learning and learning effectiveness and provide input for schools to consider in making policies, especially in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) learning. The results of the questionnaire distributed to students obtained an R value (correlation) of 0.451 and an R square value of 0.203. Therefore, there is a 45.1% correlation between variables X and Y, with variable X influencing variable Y by 20.3%. Therefore, it can be concluded that the hybrid learning method has a positive and significant influence on the effectiveness of Islamic Religious Education learning at Probolinggo 1st State Senior High School (SMAN).
References
Abualadas, H. M., & Xu, L. (2023). Achievement of learning outcomes in non-traditional (online) versus traditional (face-to-face) anatomy teaching in medical schools: A mixed method systematic review. Clinical Anatomy, 36(1), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/CA.23942
Ajagbe, S. A., Olagunju, K. M., Osunade, O., Awokola, J. A., Oladosu, J. B., & Omidiora, E. O. (2023). Hybrid Learning System: Analysis, Opportunities, Challenges, and Prospects. 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3497-3_2
Almusaed, A., Almssad, A., & Yitmen, I. (2025). Introduction to Quantitative Research. Practice of Research Methodology in Civil Engineering and Architecture, 489–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97393-2_15
Bryan, N., & Volchenkova, K. N. (2016). Blended learning: definition, models, implications for higher education. Cyberleninka.RuA Bryan, KN VolchenkovaВестник Южно-Уральского Государственного Университета. Серия, 2016•cyberleninka.Ru, 8(2), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.30547/MEDIASCOPE.1.2018.11
Buhl-Wiggers, J., Kjærgaard, A., & Munk, K. (2023). A scoping review of experimental evidence on face-to-face components of blended learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2123911
Creswell, J. W. and J. D. (2023). RESEARCH DESIGN Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.
Darojat, A., & Faishol, R. (2023). Literature Study: Learning Media To Improve The Understanding Of High School Students on Elemental Chemistry. International Conference on Humanity Education and Society (ICHES), 2(1). https://proceedingsiches.com/index.php/ojs/article/view/68
Fawaid, A., Abdullah, I., Baharun, H., Aimah, S., Faishol, R., & Hidayati, N. (2024). The Role of Online Game Simulation Based Interactive Textbooks to Reduce at-Risk Students’ Anxiety in Indonesian Language Subject. 2024 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA), 1–7.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs.
Gudoniene, D., Staneviciene, E., Huet, I., Dickel, J., Dieng, D., Degroote, J., Rocio, V., Butkiene, R., & Casanova, D. (2025). Hybrid Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(2), 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU17020756/S1
Hamalik, O. (2001). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bumi Aksara.
Hermita, N., Erlisnawati, Alim, J. A., Putra, Z. H., Mahartika, I., & Sulistiyo, U. (2024). Hybrid learning, blended learning or face-to-face learning: which one is more effective in remediating misconception? Quality Assurance in Education, 32(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2023-0019
Husamah. (2014). Pembelajaran bauran (Blended learning). Research-Report.Umm.Ac.Id. http://research-report.umm.ac.id/index.php/research-report/article/download/1171/1351
Kittur, J. (2023). Conducting Quantitative Research Study : A Step-by-Step Process. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 100–112. https://www.journaleet.in/index.php/jeet/article/view/290
Krasnova, T. (2015). A Paradigm Shift: Blended Learning Integration in Russian Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 399–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.12.543
Lakhal, S., & Meyer, F. (2020). Blended Learning. Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies, 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_41
Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Quantitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264622
Mintii, I. S. (2023). Blended learning: definition, concept, and relevance.
Qamar, M. T., Malik, A., Yasmeen, J., Sadiqe, M., & Ajmal, M. (2024). Incorporating face-to-face and online learning features to propose blended learning framework for Post-COVID classrooms in India. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 19(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-08-2023-0097
Rajaram, K. (2023). Blended Learning. Learning Intelligence: Innovative and Digital Transformative Learning Strategies: Cultural and Social Engineering Perspectives, 177–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9201-8_5/SAVE-RESEARCH
Rohmawati, A. (2015). Efektivitas Pembelajaran. : Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini. Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, Vol 9.
Siagian, S. P. (2008). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Binapura Aksara.
Sjukur, S. . (2012). Pengaruh Blended Learning terhadap motivasi belajar dan hasil belajar siswa tingkat SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 3 (2), 368-378.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan R&D. alfabeta.
Sugiyono, S. (2016). Metode Penelitan Pendidikan : Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta.
Supardi. (2013). Sekolah Efektif, Konsep Dasar dan Praktiknya. Rajawali Pers.
Teoh, S. H., Boon Zik Hong, J., Md Shamsudin, N., Singh, P., & Hartono, R. (2025). Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2451497
Thorne, K. (2003). Blended Learning; How to Integrate Online and Traditional Learning. Great Britain.
Yu, Z., & Peng, D. (2023). Visualizing and Bibliometrically Analyzing Information and Communication Technology-Based Blended Learning. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEC.324950
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Khumaidi, Kustiana Arisanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
